Importance of DNA repair in tumor suppression
- 22 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physical Society (APS) in Physical Review E
- Vol. 70 (6) , 061912
- https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.70.061912
Abstract
The transition from a normal to cancerous cell requires a number of highly specific mutations that affect cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, differentiation, and many other cell functions. One hallmark of cancerous genomes is genomic instability, with mutation rates far greater than those of normal cells. In microsatellite instability (MIN tumors), these are often caused by damage to mismatch repair genes, allowing further mutation of the genome and tumor progression. These mutation rates may lie near the error catastrophe found in the quasispecies model of adaptive RNA genomes, suggesting that further increasing mutation rates will destroy cancerous genomes. However, recent results have demonstrated that DNA genomes exhibit an error threshold at mutation rates far lower than their conservative counterparts. Furthermore, while the maximum viable mutation rate in conservative systems increases indefinitely with increasing master sequence fitness, the semiconservative threshold plateaus at a relatively low value. This implies a paradox, wherein inaccessible mutation rates are found in viable tumor cells. In this paper, we address this paradox, demonstrating an isomorphism between the conservatively replicating (RNA) quasispecies model and the semiconservative (DNA) model with post-methylation DNA repair mechanisms impaired. Thus, as DNA repair becomes inactivated, the maximum viable mutation rate increases smoothly to that of a conservatively replicating system on a transformed landscape, with an upper bound that is dependent on replication rates. We postulate that inactivation of post-methylation repair mechanisms are fundamental to the progression of a tumor cell and hence these mechanisms act as a method for prevention and destruction of cancerous genomes.Comment: 7 pages, 5 figures; Approximation replaced with exact calculation; Minor error corrected; Minor changes to model systeKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamics of cancer progressionNature Reviews Cancer, 2004
- Phase transitions in unstable cancer cell populationsZeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, 2003
- Viral evolution under the pressure of an adaptive immune system: Optimal mutation rates for viral escapeComplexity, 2002
- Coevolution of Quasispecies: B-Cell Mutation Rates Maximize Viral Error CatastrophesPhysical Review Letters, 2002
- Dynamic fitness landscapes in molecular evolutionPhysics Reports, 2001
- RNA virus error catastrophe: Direct molecular test by using ribavirinProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- Exact solution of the quasispecies model in a sharply peaked fitness landscapePhysical Review E, 1997
- Landscapes: Complex optimization problems and biopolymer structuresComputers & Chemistry, 1994
- Error thresholds for molecular quasispecies as phase transitions: From simple landscapes to spin-glass modelsPhysical Review A, 1992
- The Molecular Quasi‐SpeciesAdvances in Chemical Physics, 1989