Assessment of whole genome amplification-induced bias through high-throughput, massively parallel whole genome sequencing
Open Access
- 23 August 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Genomics
- Vol. 7 (1) , 216
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-7-216
Abstract
Background: Whole genome amplification is an increasingly common technique through which minute amounts of DNA can be multiplied to generate quantities suitable for genetic testing and analysis. Questions of amplification-induced error and template bias generated by these methods have previously been addressed through either small scale (SNPs) or large scale (CGH array, FISH) methodologies. Here we utilized whole genome sequencing to assess amplification-induced bias in both coding and non-coding regions of two bacterial genomes.Halobacteriumspecies NRC-1 DNA andCampylobacter jejuniwere amplified by several common, commercially available protocols: multiple displacement amplification, primer extension pre-amplification and degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR. The amplification-induced bias of each method was assessed by sequencing both genomes in their entirety using the 454 Sequencing System technology and comparing the results with those obtained from unamplified controls.Results: All amplification methodologies induced statistically significant bias relative to the unamplified control. For theHalobacteriumspecies NRC-1 genome, assessed at 100 base resolution, the D-statistics from GenomiPhi-amplified material were 119 times greater than those from unamplified material, 164.0 times greater for Repli-G, 165.0 times greater for PEP-PCR and 252.0 times greater than the unamplified controls for DOP-PCR. ForCampylobacter jejuni, also analyzed at 100 base resolution, the D-statistics from GenomiPhi-amplified material were 15 times greater than those from unamplified material, 19.8 times greater for Repli-G, 61.8 times greater for PEP-PCR and 220.5 times greater than the unamplified controls for DOP-PCR.Conclusion: Of the amplification methodologies examined in this paper, the multiple displacement amplification products generated the least bias, and produced significantly higher yields of amplified DNA.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Environmental Whole-Genome Amplification To Access Microbial Populations in Contaminated SedimentsApplied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006
- Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactorsNature, 2005
- A Diarylquinoline Drug Active on the ATP Synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosisScience, 2005
- DNA amplification method tolerant to sample degradationGenome Research, 2004
- Degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR: General amplification of target DNA by a single degenerate primerPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Whole Genome Analysis of Genetic Alterations in Small DNA Samples Using Hyperbranched Strand Displacement Amplification and Array–CGHGenome Research, 2003
- Making ‘random amplification’ predictable in whole genome analysisTrends in Biotechnology, 2002
- Rapid Amplification of Plasmid and Phage DNA Using Phi29 DNA Polymerase and Multiply-Primed Rolling Circle AmplificationGenome Research, 2001
- Microbial genomes – the untapped resourceTrends in Biotechnology, 2000
- Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy number variation in breast cancer using DNA microarraysNature Genetics, 1999