How an unfamiliar thing should be called
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
- Vol. 11 (5) , 437-445
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067492
Abstract
An empirical method is described to derive good names for unfamiliar objects. It is based on three principles: (1) The names should be within users' linguistic capacities; (2) names should be informationally efficient; (3) names should form a classification system. The principles lead to a three-step method: (1) Subjects generate names for the objects; (2) a subset of the names, which fulfills the principles, is selected; (3) how good the names are is tested by matching and recall tasks. Steps 2 and 3 are iterated to improve the nnames. The names that result are natural, short, easily matched with their physical referents, and well recalled. The method is generalizable and ought to be useful in a large variety of situations where names for unfamiliar objects are needed.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Creating names for thingsJournal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1981
- The role of context in creating names∗Discourse Processes, 1980
- Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development.Psychological Review, 1974
- How shall a thing be called?Psychological Review, 1958