Computerized Virtual Patients in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Academic Medicine
- Vol. 85 (10) , 1589-1602
- https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e3181edfe13
Abstract
Purpose Educators increasingly use virtual patients (computerized clinical case simulations) in health professions training. The authors summarize the effect of virtual patients compared with no intervention and alternate instructional methods, and elucidate features of effective virtual patient design. Method The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsychINFO, and Scopus through February 2009 for studies describing virtual patients for practicing and student physicians, nurses, and other health professionals. Reviewers, working in duplicate, abstracted information on instructional design and outcomes. Effect sizes were pooled using a random-effects model. Results Four qualitative, 18 no-intervention controlled, 21 noncomputer instruction-comparative, and 11 computer-assisted instruction-comparative studies were found. Heterogeneity was large (I-2 > 50%) in most analyses. Compared with no intervention, the pooled effect size (95% confidence interval; number of studies) was 0.94 (0.69 to 1.19; N = 11) for knowledge outcomes, 0.80 (0.52 to 1.08; N = 5) for clinical reasoning, and 0.90 (0.61 to 1.19; N = 9) for other skills. Compared with noncomputer instruction, pooled effect size (positive numbers favoring virtual patients) was -0.17 (-0.57 to 0.24; N = 8) for satisfaction, 0.06 (-0.14 to 0.25; N = 5) for knowledge, -0.004 (-0.30 to 0.29; N = 10) for reasoning, and 0.10 (-0.21 to 0.42; N = 11) for other skills. Comparisons of different virtual patient designs suggest that repetition until demonstration of mastery, advance organizers, enhanced feedback, and explicitly contrasting cases can improve learning outcomes. Conclusions Virtual patients are associated with large positive effects compared with no intervention. Effects in comparison with noncomputer instruction are on average small. Further research clarifying how to effectively implement virtual patients is needed.This publication has 83 references indexed in Scilit:
- Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next stepsMedical Education, 2009
- Building a virtual patient commonsMedical Teacher, 2008
- Medical Errors Involving TraineesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2007
- Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversiesClinical Medicine, 2007
- The case of the misleading funnel plotBMJ, 2006
- A randomized trial of teaching clinical skills using virtual and live standardized patientsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Reporting of Noninferiority and Equivalence Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2006
- Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic reviewMedical Teacher, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneityStatistics in Medicine, 2003