Some Opinions about Recovering Mind
- 1 October 1982
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 47 (4) , 742-760
- https://doi.org/10.2307/280280
Abstract
Archaeologists have tried to reconstruct patterns of thought, meaning, and ideas, using theories of structuralism, cognition, and ideology. Case studies involving each of the theories are described, and the strengths and weakness of their application to archaeological data are presented. Structuralism is found to yield substantial examples with well-worked treatments of archaeological data. These examples tend to ignore economic context, however. Materialism, especially neo-Marxism, contains thorough definitions of ideology that may be useful to archaeology because they preserve economic context. However, such definitions are new to the field and presently offer few well-worked examples of how to handle archaeological data.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Materialist Approaches in PrehistoryAnnual Review of Anthropology, 1981
- Visiting the Past: History Museums in the United StatesRadical History Review, 1981
- Hunter-Gatherers in Africa: The !Kung San . Men, Women, and Work in a Foraging Society. Richard Borshay Lee. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1979. xxvi, 526 pp., illus. Cloth, $34.95; paper, $10.95.Science, 1980
- An Anthropocentric Perspective for Eastern United States PrehistoryAmerican Antiquity, 1977
- Bronze age synamics in southeast SpainDialectical Anthropology, 1975
- Territorial Organization of the Lowland Classic MayaScience, 1973
- Ritual, Sanctity, and Cybernetics1American Anthropologist, 1971
- The Evolution of Paleolithic ArtScientific American, 1968
- Archaeology as AnthropologyAmerican Antiquity, 1962
- Ethos, World-View and the Analysis of Sacred SymbolsThe Antioch Review, 1957