Recommended criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs
- 1 January 1980
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Aihaj Journal
- Vol. 41 (1) , 40-48
- https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668091424339
Abstract
Hearing level data from several North Carolina industrial populations is analyzed. The analysis considered several different test retest criteria as well as changes in hearing levels with time at different testing frequencies. The findings demonstrate the necessity for subdividing the populations by race and sex. A characteristic of programs that are classified as acceptable is a significant improvement over the first four to six years of testing in the mean hearing levels (the learning curve) at 3, 4 and 6 kHz with respect to the baseline hearing test. A significant correlation is established between the change in the mean hearing level at 4 kHz and a test retest criterion defined as a shift in mean hearing level equal to or greater than 15 dB at any frequency tested in either ear.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Age effect hearing levels for a white nonindustrial noise exposed population (ninep) and their use in evaluating industrial hearing conservation programsAihaj Journal, 1979
- Presumed noise-induced permanent threshold shift resulting from exposure to an A-weighted Leq of 89 dBThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1978
- Hearing Levels of Non industrial Noise Exposed SubjectsJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1977
- Race Difference in Auditory SensitivityJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1964
- Age and Sex Differences in Pure-Tone Thresholds: Survey of Hearing Levels From 18 to 65 YearsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1963