Sedation for invasive procedures in paediatrics
Open Access
- 1 October 1997
- journal article
- review article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 77 (4) , 281-284
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.77.4.281
Abstract
It is inappropriate to subject children to distressing procedures if this can be avoided. Moreover, many procedures may be difficult or unsafe in the uncooperative child. The number of valuable but invasive techniques in use has increased steadily over the years, and to facilitate these, sedative agents are often given. Such use of sedation is generally supervised by non-anaesthetists. Despite the obvious benefits associated with this practice, there are unresolved concerns about its efficacy and safety. The ideal sedative regimen would act predictably and rapidly and would induce a level and duration of sedation appropriate to the procedure being performed. In practice, few regimens are truly satisfactory in these terms. General anaesthesia may therefore be preferred, but for many procedures (for example, liver biopsy) this might seem inappropriate. Widespread use of general anaesthesia for these purposes would also have substantial resource implications for paediatric departments. The use of sedation in our hospital is probably comparable with that in many similar institutions.1-3 Many children undergo cardiac catheterisation and other radiological procedures under sedation. Protocols vary, but often include high dose chloral hydrate, or a combination of temazepam and droperidol, and in many cases it is necessary to induce quite deep levels of sedation. As an indication of the volume and importance of this activity, magnetic resonance imaging alone accounts for more than 1100 procedures in our radiology department each year. We also perform about 800 gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures annually in infants and children, and for most of these we employ intravenous sedation using a combination of midazolam and pethidine. Gastrointestinal endoscopy became part of paediatric practice about 20 years ago, and from the beginning this invasive technology posed great challenges with regard to sedation.3 In this article I shall discuss the difficulties and controversies surrounding endoscopic sedation in order …Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy, safety, and cost of intravenous sedation versus general anesthesia in children undergoing endoscopic proceduresPublished by Elsevier ,1995
- Efficacy of Diazepam and Meperidine in Ambulatory Pediatric Patients Undergoing EndoscopyJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 1993
- Should Pediatric Gastroenterologists Be I.V. Drug Users?Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 1993
- Results from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy/U.S. Food and Drug Administration collaborative study on complication rates and drug use during gastrointestinal endoscopyGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1991
- Recommendations for standards of sedation and patient monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy.Gut, 1991
- Improving the standards of endoscopy.Gut, 1991
- Sedation in children scanned with high-field magnetic resonance; the experience at The Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond StreetThe British Journal of Radiology, 1990
- Review article: premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopyAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1990
- Arterial oxygen saturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: the effects of a midazolam/pethidine combination.Gut, 1990
- Monitoring the patient receiving conscious sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: issues and guidelinesGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1989