Should we always choose a nonparametric test when comparing two apparently nonnormal distributions?

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:

• Increasing Physicians’ Awareness of the Impact of Statistics on Research Outcomes: Comparative Power of the t-test and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test in Small Samples Applied Research
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
• Combination chemotherapy with mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF can efficiently mobilize PBPC in patients with Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
  Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1998
• PARAMETRIC ALTERNATIVES TO THE STUDENT / TESTUNDER VIOLATION OF NORMALITY AND HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE
  Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1992
• Parametric Alternatives to the Student T Test under Violation of Normality and Homogeneity of Variance
  Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1992
• A comparison between the U and V tests in the Behrens-Fisher problem
  Biometrika, 1983
• Robustness of Some Procedures for the Two-Sample Location Problem
  Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1964
• The Wilcoxon Test and Non-Null Hypotheses
  Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 1960
• Distributions Related to Comparison of Two Means and Two Regression Coefficients
  The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1950
• THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TWO MEANS WHEN THE POPULATION VARIANCES ARE UNEQUAL
  Biometrika, 1938