Accuracy of Diagnostic Procedures: Has It Improved Over the Past Five Decades?
- 1 May 2007
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 188 (5) , 1173-1178
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.06.1270
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 93 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Cancer Detection Using Computer-Aided Detection with Diagnostic and Screening Mammography: Prospective Study of 104 CancersAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2006
- Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworkingEuropean Radiology, 2005
- Comparison of Premortem Clinical Diagnoses in Critically Ill Patients and Subsequent Autopsy FindingsMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2000
- Estimating the accuracy of screening mammographyAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 1998
- Errors in judgment.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- A Primer on the Precision and Accuracy of the Clinical ExaminationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992
- The Role of the Reference Radiologist; Estimates of Inter-Observer Agreement and Potential Delay in Cancer Detection in the National Breast Screening StudyInvestigative Radiology, 1990
- Directed Versus Free Search for Nodules in Chest RadiographsInvestigative Radiology, 1982
- OBSERVER ERROR ITS BEARING ON TEACHINGThe Lancet, 1955
- OBSERVER ERROR IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CHEST FILMS: AN INTERNATIONAL INVESTIGATIONThe Lancet, 1952