Comparative Analysis of National Legislation in Support of the Revised International Health Regulations: Potential Models for Implementation in the United States
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 100 (12) , 2347-2353
- https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.180414
Abstract
In 2005, the World Health Organization adopted the revised International Health Regulations, or IHR (2005), to establish obligations for detecting and responding to public health emergencies of international concern. The success of the IHR (2005) rests on the ability of states to implement the objectives and to execute the regulations in a legal and politically acceptable manner. Implementation of the IHR (2005) may be challenging for federalist nations, where most public health regulatory power lies in local rather than in national governments. We examine the implementation strategies of 4 nations: Australia, Canada, Germany, and India. The methods currently being considered by these nations for executing the IHR (2005) are potentially applicable models for the United States to consider.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Strategies for implementing the new International Health Regulations in federal countriesBulletin of the World Health Organization, 2008
- Implementing the revised International Health Regulations in India.2008