Policing corporate crime: A typology of enforcement styles
- 1 June 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Justice Quarterly
- Vol. 1 (2) , 235-251
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07418828400088131
Abstract
In the past few years, journalists, politicians, and business spokes-persons have all leveled criticisms against regulatory enforcement agencies—some charging that agencies are too lenient to be effective, others that strict enforcement has created useless hardships for industry. Most scholarly research on regulatory enforcement has sought to find the reasons why an agency (or inspectors) adopt either a conciliatory or a stringent approach to enforcement. A different facet of this issue is to ask how an enforcement strategy is implemented through the organizational structure and culture of the agency. This paper develops a typology that focuses on the organizational processes through which an enforcement strategy is implemented.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- BARGAIN AND BLUFF: Compliance Strategy and Deterrence in the Enforcement of RegulationLaw & Policy, 1983
- The New Regulation of Health And SafetyPolitical Science Quarterly, 1980
- The Administration of Safety: The Enforcement Policy of the Early Factory Inspectorate, 1844–1864Public Administration, 1980
- Ceremonial Justice: Crime and Punishment in a Loosely Coupled SystemSocial Forces, 1979
- Ceremonial Justice: Crime and Punishment in a Loosely Coupled SystemSocial Forces, 1979
- Regulating BusinessPublished by Springer Nature ,1979
- Social movements and regulatory agencies: Toward a more adequate?and less pessimistic?Theory of ?clientele capture?Policy Sciences, 1975
- Traffic and the PolicePublished by Harvard University Press ,1969
- Regulating Business by Independent CommissionPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1955