Genomic imprinting and epigenetic reprogramming: Unearthing the garden of forking paths
- 17 September 2002
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Reproduction and Development
- Vol. 63 (3) , 269-272
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.90011
Abstract
Genomic imprinting, an epigenetic form of gene regulation, determines the parent‐dependent gene expression of marked or imprinted genes during gametogenesis and embryonic development. Imprinting involves differential allele DNA methylation in one sex cell lineage but not in the other. Egg and sperm each contributes the same DNA sequences to the zygote but epigenetic imprinting of a subset of genes determines that only one of the parent alleles are expressed relative to the parental origin. Primordial germ cells inherit biallelically imprinted genes from maternal and paternal origin and erase their imprints to start de novo monoallelic imprinting during gametogenesis. Epigenetic paternalization is an ongoing process in the mitotically‐dividing spermatogonial stem cell and derived meiotically‐dividing spermatocyte progeny to endow sperm with imprinted alleles. Epigenetic maternalization is restricted to the oocyte growth phase of folliculogenesis and is unrelated to DNA replication since it takes place while the oocyte remains in the diplotene stage of meiotic prophase I. Sperm and oocyte genomic methylation patterns depend on the activity of DNA methyltransferases (Dnmt). A variant of Dnmt1, designated Dnmt1o, accumulates in oocyte nuclei during the follicular growth phase. Dnmt3L, an isoform of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b, but lacking enzymatic activity, interacts with Dnmt2a and Dnmt3b and is required for spermatogenesis. In the mouse early zygote, the male pronucleus is demethylated within 4 h of fertilization. Global demethylation takes place gradually up to the morula stage. In the blastocyst, de novo methylation is reestablished in the inner cell mass but not in the trophectoderm. Both the significance of genomic imprinting and the severe developmental defects caused by disrupted Dnmt activity, point to a need for a better understanding of the causes of low cloning efficiency by somatic nuclear transfer to enucleated ovulated oocyte. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 63: 269–272, 2002.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aberrant methylation patterns at the two‐cell stage as an indicator of early developmental failureMolecular Reproduction and Development, 2002
- Dynamics of Dnmt1 Methyltransferase Expression and Intracellular Localization during Oogenesis and Preimplantation DevelopmentDevelopmental Biology, 2002
- A global disorder of imprinting in the human female germ lineNature, 2002
- Methylation Dynamics of Imprinted Genes in Mouse Germ CellsGenomics, 2002
- Regulation of Stage-Specific Nuclear Translocation of Dnmt1o during Preimplantation Mouse DevelopmentDevelopmental Biology, 2002
- Dnmt3L and the Establishment of Maternal Genomic ImprintsScience, 2001
- Spatial Separation of Parental Genomes in Preimplantation Mouse EmbryosThe Journal of cell biology, 2000
- Methylation-Induced Repression— Belts, Braces, and ChromatinPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- PARENTAL IMPRINTING AND HUMAN DISEASEAnnual Review of Genetics, 1996
- Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethalityPublished by Elsevier ,1992