Improvement of Phylogenies after Removing Divergent and Ambiguously Aligned Blocks from Protein Sequence Alignments
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Systematic Biology
- Vol. 56 (4) , 564-577
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701472164
Abstract
Alignment quality may have as much impact on phylogenetic reconstruction as the phylogenetic methods used. Not only the alignment algorithm, but also the method used to deal with the most problematic alignment regions, may have a critical effect on the final tree. Although some authors remove such problematic regions, either manually or using automatic methods, in order to improve phylogenetic performance, others prefer to keep such regions to avoid losing any information. Our aim in the present work was to examine whether phylogenetic reconstruction improves after alignment cleaning or not. Using simulated protein alignments with gaps, we tested the relative performance in diverse phylogenetic analyses of the whole alignments versus the alignments with problematic regions removed with our previously developed Gblocks program. We also tested the performance of more or less stringent conditions in the selection of blocks. Alignments constructed with different alignment methods (ClustalW, Mafft, and Probcons) were used to estimate phylogenetic trees by maximum likelihood, neighbor joining, and parsimony. We show that, in most alignment conditions, and for alignments that are not too short, removal of blocks leads to better trees. That is, despite losing some information, there is an increase in the actual phylogenetic signal. Overall, the best trees are obtained by maximum-likelihood reconstruction of alignments cleaned by Gblocks. In general, a relaxed selection of blocks is better for short alignment, whereas a stringent selection is more adequate for longer ones. Finally, we show that cleaned alignments produce better topologies although, paradoxically, with lower bootstrap. This indicates that divergent and problematic alignment regions may lead, when present, to apparently better supported although, in fact, more biased topologies.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignmentNucleic Acids Research, 2005
- The information content of an ambiguously alignable region, a case study of the trnL intron from the RhamnaceaeOrganisms Diversity & Evolution, 2004
- MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughputNucleic Acids Research, 2004
- Unalignable sequences and molecular evolutionTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2001
- T-coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment 1 1Edited by J. ThorntonJournal of Molecular Biology, 2000
- CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choiceNucleic Acids Research, 1994
- Alignment-Ambiguous Nucleotide Sites and the Exclusion of Systematic DataMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1993
- A statistical method for detecting regions with different evolutionary dynamics in multialigned sequencesMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1992
- The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequencesBioinformatics, 1992
- A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteinsJournal of Molecular Biology, 1970