Significance of Node Biopsy Before Definitive Treatment of Cervical Metastatic Carcinoma
- 1 April 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
- Vol. 88 (4) , 594-597
- https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.1978.88.4.594
Abstract
A survey was made of 714 radical neck dissections done alone or in combination with resection of a primary malignancy. Sixty-four (8.9%) of the patients had had a cervical node biopsy before diagnosis and definitive treatment. The complications of wound necrosis, local cervical recurrence, and distant metastasis were significantly higher in those patients than in patients who had had no biopsy or who had had biopsy only at the time of definitive treatment. When 40 of the 64 patients were matched on the basis of age, sex, histological diagnosis, site and stage of the lesion and treatment protocol with 40 patients who had had no biopsy, this trend toward a higher complication rate when previous biopsy was done continued and was significantly higher for distant metastasis. The authors believe that these findings quantitatively confirm the accepted belief that, except for instances when no primary lesion can be found and the cervical mass must be biopsied for the purposes of diagnosis, such biopsy increases local complications and, by increasing the incidence of distant metastasis, decreases the chance for survival.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Metastatic carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes with occult primary tumour—diagnosis and treatmentThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1970
- The Diagnostic Significance of a “Lump in the Neck”Postgraduate Medicine, 1952
- THE CASE FOR BRANCHIOGENIC CANCER (MALIGNANT BRANCHIOMA)Annals of Surgery, 1950