The Changing Ratio of Bioactive to Immunoreactive Luteinizing Hormone (LH) through Puberty Principally Reflects Changing LH Radioimmunoassay Dose-Response Characteristics*

Abstract
The ratio (B/I) of bioactive to immunoreactive LH in plasma varies during pubertal maturation. To elucidatethe basis for these changes, we compared the dose-response characteristics of LH standards to those of plasma LH before and after GnRH infusion in normal males at various pubertal stages and girls with Turner's syndrome. We used a human LH (hLH) RIA modified to optimize specificity for LH bioactivity by employing a hLH tracer maximally bioactive in the rat interstitial cell testosterone production (RICT) bioassay. The pituitary hLH standards LER-907, NHPP 1–1, and NHPP 1–2 were not parallel to one another in the RIA, but were parallel in the RICT. Their relative slopes in the RIA were 1:1.35:1.49, respectively. The B/I for immunoreactive LH in these standards were 1 (LER-907):3 (I-l):5 (1–2). Dose-response characteristics varied greatly by patient category in the RIA. In contrast to the RICT, in which plasma from all subject groups, except the prepubertal basal group, gave parallel dose-response slopes, the groups differed in the steepness of their plasma LH RIA dose-response curves in the following order: adult post-GnRH ≃ adult basal ≃ pubertal post-GnRH > pubertal basal ≃ prepubertal post-GnRH ≃ prepubertal basal > Turner's syndrome. Prepubertal basal samples most closelyresembled LER-907 in dose-response characteristics, while adult samples were most similar to NHPP 1–1 and 1–2. These characteristics were not related to the absolute LH concentration. Although the RIA dose-response characteristics of plasma LH changed during puberty, the B/I of basal LH did not increase through puberty using the modified hLH RIA, although B/I stillrose in GnRH-stimulated samples during puberty. Our data demonstrate that the principal cause of variability in B/I is the changing dose-response characteristics of plasma LH in the RIA. We suggest that the source of this variability is a change in the molecular characteristics of LH in different states of pubertal maturation and gonadal function. The results imply that better ways of assaying LH are needed.

This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit: