Abstract
This paper is concerned with developing an understanding of the lived time of experience. Reconsidering Bergson's duration, it is argued that by privileging flow to the exclusion of stasis, he does not take his own concern with contingency far enough. Through an analysis of experiences of rupture I argue that discontinuities and moments of stasis are integral to the movement of lived experience. What is at issue here is how we live the future, different experiences of anticipation of the future, and understandings of temporalities of the self.

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit: