Possible Planning Roles for Regional Government: A Survey of City Planning Directors in California
- 31 March 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 62 (1) , 17-29
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975668
Abstract
A survey of California city planning directors finds about half to be supportive of regional government. Support is higher in the San Francisco Bay area than in the Los Angeles area. Planning directors strongly favor a role for regional government in “system-maintenance” functions and in environmental protection, but most oppose its involvement in “life-style” services and local growth regulations. Many question the ability of regional governments to solve problems or respond effectively to local issues. As in studies of citizens' preferences, the predictors of support for regional government involve perceived self-interest and a willingness to give up local control. The article points out the implications for states seeking to include regional governance in growth management.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Planners' Attitude Toward GrowthA Comparative Case StudyJournal of the American Planning Association, 1994
- Mandates, Plans, and Planners: Building Local Commitment to Development ManagementJournal of the American Planning Association, 1994
- Regional Variations in Support for Regional GovernanceUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1994
- The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan QualityJournal of Planning Education and Research, 1994
- Restructuring Land Use GovernanceJournal of Planning Literature, 1993
- Suburban CommunitiesAnnual Review of Sociology, 1992
- Constituencies for Limitation and RegionalismUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1990
- Diminishing UtilityUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1990
- Citizen Support for Regional Government in the New SuburbiaUrban Affairs Quarterly, 1989
- Growth Controls, Population Growth, and Community SatisfactionAmerican Sociological Review, 1982