The Relevance of Leadership Variables for Performance Appraisal
- 1 January 1989
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Personnel Review
- Vol. 18 (1) , 35-40
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eum0000000000770
Abstract
A great deal of time and effort is invested by personnel managers and researchers in minimising performance appraisal errors. Until recently, these efforts concentrated on improving the design, implementation and the monitoring of appraisal instruments, producing only minimal improvement in the accuracy of performance appraisal. The amount and type of impact that leadership style and other rater characteristics have on appraisal errors are investigated.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN INVESTIGATION OF THE RATER-RATEE ACQUAINTANCE AND RATER BIAS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1985
- A CLOSER LOOK AT HALO ERROR IN PERFORMANCE RATINGS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1985
- Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1981
- Leadership Style and Leniency Bias in Evaluation of Employees' PerformancePsychological Reports, 1980
- Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980
- Behavioral expectation scales versus summated scales: A fairer comparison.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Behaviorally anchored scales for measuring morale in military units.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution ProcessPublished by Elsevier ,1977
- Differentiation matchingBehavioral Science, 1971
- Rater Bias in Forced‐Distribution Performance RatingsPersonnel Psychology, 1966