A COMPARISON OF THE VARIOUS PARAMETERS EMPLOYED IN THE VARIABLE‐FREQUENCY INDUCED‐POLARIZATION METHOD

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The increased use of the induced‐polarization method in recent years has resulted in two methods of measurement. The measurements in the frequency domain (variable‐frequency method) rely on changes in the apparent resistivities measured as the frequency of the applied current is varied. The measurement in the time domain (pulse‐transient method) detects transients in the measured potentials when the applied current is interrupted. The “chargeability” is the parameter used in the pulse‐transient method, while both the “frequency effect” and the normalized parameter “metal factor” are used in the variable‐frequency method. The most useful parameter would be the one which best indicates the amount of metallic mineralization present. Eight sets of field results from variable‐frequency field surveys are shown. The cases are shown in pairs; in each pair, the geometry of the source is much the same. By comparing the resistivity, the frequency effect (chargeability), and metal‐factor data with the amount of mineralization indicated by the drilling results, the usefulness of these parameters can be evaluated.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: