A Contingency Approach to Laboratory Learning: Psychological Types Versus Experiential Norms
- 1 December 1974
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 27 (9) , 891-909
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872677402700904
Abstract
This study investigated the psychological dynamics and situational factors that determine whether an individual will experience support and/or confrontation in a laboratory setting. The psychological dynamics were represented by C. G. Jung's psychological types and the situational factors were the experiential norms that manifest these psychic functions. A Contingency framework was derived to suggest the conditions that will lead to the acceptance or rejection of the laboratory experience, or to self-awareness and personal growth. The research data give reasonable evidence to this framework, and the implications of the study are given for: (1) the identification of the rejectors of particular laboratory experiences, (2) the design of different laboratories via alternative experiential norms, and (3) the intervention strategies for staff and trainers according to the laboratory setting and goals.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Study of Encounter Group CasualtiesArchives of General Psychiatry, 1971
- The Influence of the Trainer on Participant Change in T-GroupsHuman Relations, 1969
- Mutually Therapeutic Perception and Self-Awareness under Variable ConditionsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1969
- Personality and the "Laboratory Style"'The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968
- Extraversion and Libido in Jung and CattellThe Journal of Analytical Psychology, 1967
- Personal Style, Group Composition, and LearningThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1965
- Human relations training: Processes and outcomes.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1960