The Myths of Reparations
- 1 September 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Central European History
- Vol. 11 (3) , 231-255
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008938900018707
Abstract
Reparations after World War I can be divided into two categories: non-German reparations, which remain largelyterra incognitato the historian, and German reparations, an excruciatingly tangled thicket into which only a few intrepid explorers have ventured. Understandably, most students of twentieth-century history have preferred to sidestep the perils of travel on territory of extreme financial complexity and, as a consequence, a number of misconceptions about the history of German reparations remain in circulation. This brief summary is not addressed to those few brave trailblazers, whose work it indeed salutes, but rather to those many who have assiduously avoided the subject and to the myths about reparations which still adorn studies of the Weimar Republic and interwar history.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Walther Rathenau and the Weimar RepublicPublished by Project MUSE ,1971
- MacDonald versus HendersonPublished by Springer Nature ,1970
- A propos de l'occupation de la RuhrRevue d’histoire moderne & contemporaine, 1970
- Reparations Reconsidered: A ReminderCentral European History, 1969
- The Defeat of Germany in 1918 and the European Balance of PowerCentral European History, 1969
- Weimar and the Rise of HitlerPublished by Springer Nature ,1968