The measurement of active errors: methodological issues
Open Access
- 1 December 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Vol. 12 (90002) , 8ii-12
- https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.12.suppl_2.ii8
Abstract
The value of research in any topic area turns on its validity. Patient safety research has revealed—or, at least, given renewed urgency to—a raft of methodological issues. The meaning and thus the value of empirical research in this field is contingent on getting the methodology right. The need for good methods for the measurement of error is necessary whenever an inference is intended and, since inferences lie at the heart of research and management, there is a huge need to understand better how to make measurements that are meaningful, precise, and accurate. In this paper we consider issues relating to the measurement of error and the need for more research.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation and application of an instrument for measuring patient relatives' perception of quality of geriatric care.International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2003
- Using standardized patients to measure professional performance of physiciansInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2003
- The Reliability of Medical Record Review for Estimating Adverse Event RatesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- The Leeds University maternity audit projectInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2002
- Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health careInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2001
- Estimating Hospital Deaths Due to Medical ErrorsJAMA, 2001
- What is an error?2001
- What is a prescribing error?Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2000
- Discussion Between Reviewers Does Not Improve Reliability of Peer Review of Hospital QualityMedical Care, 2000
- An evaluation of adverse incident reportingJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1999