Comparative evaluation of five height–diameter models developed for black spruce and jack pine stand-types in terms of goodness-of-fit, lack-of-fit and predictive ability
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Forest Ecology and Management
- Vol. 247 (1-3) , 149-166
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.029
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Models for predicting product recovery using selected tree characteristics of black spruceCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005
- Linkages between silviculture and ecology: an analysis of density management diagramsForest Ecology and Management, 1996
- Linear regression in astronomy. IIThe Astrophysical Journal, 1992
- Analytical and monte carlo comparisons of six different linear least squares fitsCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 1992
- Linear regression in astronomy.The Astrophysical Journal, 1990
- Plant Growth Analysis: Allometry, Growth and Interference in Orchardgrass and TimothyAnnals of Botany, 1988
- Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical AccuracyStatistical Science, 1986
- Performance and comparison of stand growth models based on individual tree and diameter-class growthCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1979
- Some Comments on C PTechnometrics, 1973
- Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant BiomassCanadian Journal of Forest Research, 1972