Cellular studies and interaction mechanisms of extremely low frequency fields
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Radio Science
- Vol. 30 (1) , 179-203
- https://doi.org/10.1029/94rs01159
Abstract
Worldwide interest in the biological effects of ELF (extremely low frequency, E) or the magnetic (B) field, or if combinations of staticBand time‐varyingBfields represent an exposure metric for the cell. This question relates directly to understanding fundamental interaction mechanisms and to the development of a rationale for ELF dose threshold guidelines. The weight of experimental evidence indicates that an inducedEfield according to Faraday's law of induction during magnetic field exposures elicits cellular effects. AnE‐field‐mediated interaction has interesting consequences for microdosimetry at the cellular level and is mechanistically consistent with an interaction at the cell surface, since theEfield does not penetrate beyond the cell membrane. Recently, several studies have suggested that an ELFBfield by itself or in combination with a staticBfield may elicit cellular effects. Thus in addition toE‐field‐mediated effects, other interaction mechanisms as yet not fully understood may operate at the cellular level; this complexity is in contrast to the case for ionizing radiation. In addition to the question of an exposure field metric, the biological state of the target cell is important in ELF interactions. Biological factors such as cell type, cell cycle, cell activation, age of donor animal, passage number of cell line, presence of specific growth/mitogenic factors, temperature, shape, and cell density/packing during exposures have been shown to play a role in mediating ELF interactions with cells. Most recently, reports of single‐cell studies usher in a new direction for research that can be termed microbioelectromagnetics. Single‐cell digital microscopy introduces a new approach to answer the above questions with potential for real‐time microdosimetry and bioeffects limited only by the spatial resolution of state‐of‐the‐art microscopy, which is approximately 0.1 /μm. Digital imaging microscopy should therefore permit the quantitative assessment of spatial and temporal features of ELF field interactions within living single cells.Keywords
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- A REVIEW OF IN VITRO STUDIES: LOW-FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDSAihaj Journal, 1993
- ELF magnetic fields, breast cancer, and melatonin: 60 Hz fields block melatonin's oncostatic action on ER+ breast cancer cell proliferationJournal of Pineal Research, 1993
- Biological Interactions of Cellular Systems with Time‐varying Magnetic FieldsaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1992
- Dosimetry of extremely-low-frequency magnetic fieldsBioelectromagnetics, 1992
- Failure to reproduce increased calcium uptake in human lymphocytes at purported cyclotron resonance exposure conditionsRadiation and Environmental Biophysics, 1991
- Effect of coherence time of the applied magnetic field on ornithine decarboxylase activityBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1991
- Delineation of electric and magnetic field effects of extremely low frequency electromagnetic radiation on transcriptionBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1991
- Optimal experimental design for in vitro studies with ELF magnetic fieldsBioelectromagnetics, 1990
- Colony size, cell density and nature of the tumor promoter are critical variables in expression of a transformed phenotype (focus formation) in co-cultures of UV-TDTx and C3H10T1/2 cellsCarcinogenesis: Integrative Cancer Research, 1987