Effects of Cryopreservation on Bull Sperm Head Morphometry
- 12 November 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Andrology
- Vol. 19 (6) , 704-709
- https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.1998.tb02079.x
Abstract
Artificial insemination using cryopreserved semen is a common management tool of the contemporary livestock producer. However, cryopreservation is detrimental to sperm function and fertility, killing some 50% of the spermatozoa during the process. Prediction of cryopreservation damage from prefreeze samples remains elusive. Computer-automated sperm head morphometry was used in this study to determine the effects of cryopreservation on bovine sperm head morphometry. Semen was collected from 18 bulls and was divided. One portion was extended to 200 x 10(6) sperm/ml and a microscope slide was prepared, while the remaining portion was cryopreserved in a Triscitrate-yolk extender. After thawing, the cryopreserved samples were prepared on microscope slides. All slides were air dried and were stained with hematoxylin and rose bengal. The morphometric dimensions for length, width, width/length, area, and perimeter for a minimum of 200 sperm heads were analyzed from each slide by computer-aided sperm head morphometry analysis, and the mean measurements were recorded. Bull sperm heads were significantly (P < 0.01) smaller in cryopreserved spermatozoa than in the companion extended samples for length (8.56+/-0.07 vs. 8.63+/-0.08 microm), width (4.39+/-0.05 vs. 4.48+/-0.05 microm), area (28.42+/-0.07 vs. 29.14+/-0.08 microm), and perimeter (23.33+/-0.21 vs. 23.70+/-0.23 microm) for all bulls. Width/length was also different (0.513 vs. 0.519). In addition, differences (P < 0.05) were found within 14 of 18 bulls for at least four of the morphometric parameters. The percent change in measures after cryopreservation were correlated (P < or = 0.05) to the variability of the extended sample. Variations in sperm head measurements were lower (P < or = 0.05) in extended samples of the four bulls in which no changes occurred than in extended samples of the remaining 14 bulls. These data suggest that the variability in sperm head measurements of individual bulls, or ejaculates, may be an indicator of sperm cryosurvivability.This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Cryopreservation on Bovine Sperm Organelle Function and Viability As Determined by Flow Cytometry1Biology of Reproduction, 1998
- Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing functionReproduction, Fertility and Development, 1995
- Fluorescent staining as a method of assessing membrane damage and post-thaw survival of ram spermatozoaTheriogenology, 1994
- Factors affecting preservation and fertility of bull sperm: a brief reviewReproduction, Fertility and Development, 1993
- Chromatin alterations induced by freeze-thawing influence the fertilizing ability of human spermInternational Journal of Andrology, 1991
- Effects of freezing-thawing on the spermatozoon nucleus: a comparative chromatin cytophotometric study in the porcine and human speciesReproduction Nutrition Développement, 1990
- Influence of extender, cryoperservative and seminal processing procedures on postthaw motility of canine spermatozoa frozen in strawsTheriogenology, 1989
- Freezing and thawing alter chromatin stability of ejaculated human spermatozoa: Fluorescence acridine orange staining and Feulgen‐DNA cytophotometric studiesGamete Research, 1988
- Effect of Cryopreservation on the Nuclear Chromatin Decondensation Ability of Human SpermatozoaArchives of Andrology, 1984
- A STUDY OF THE HEAD LENGTH VARIABILITY OF EQUINE SPERMATOZOACanadian Journal of Research, 1930