Developing clinical guidelines: a challenge to current methods
Open Access
- 15 September 2005
- Vol. 331 (7517) , 631-3
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7517.631
Abstract
Clinical guidelines are rarely based solely on research evidence. In most cases they also incorporate the consensus views of experts. Despite recognition of the need for rigour in developing a consensus, current approaches often lack sufficient transparency, fail to make clear what influence the level of resources in the health system has, lack sufficient reliability, and will never achieve comprehensive and timely coverage of the whole range of health care. We propose a new approach that we believe will be more cost effective and that could meet these challenges.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- NICE Work — Providing Guidance to the British National Health ServiceNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgmentsBMJ, 2004
- Beyond the evidence in clinical guidelinesThe Lancet, 2004
- An experimental study of determinants of group judgments in clinical guideline developmentThe Lancet, 2004
- The Appropriateness MethodMedical Decision Making, 2004
- Influence of Clinical and Economical Factors on the Expert Rating of Appropriateness of Preoperative Use of Recombinant Erythropoietin in Elective Orthopedic Surgery PatientsMedical Decision Making, 2004
- Effect of Specialty and Nationality on Panel Judgments of the Appropriateness of Coronary RevascularizationMedical Care, 2001
- Do Clinical Practice Guidelines Reflect Research Evidence?Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2000
- Physician recommendations for coronary revascularization. Variations by clinical specialityEuropean Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Clinical guidelines: Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelinesBMJ, 1999