Feasibility of a Multi-State Outcomes Program for Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
Open Access
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
- Vol. 19 (6) , 352-359
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00008483-199911000-00005
Abstract
Outcomes validate program performance and patient benefits received from cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation. However, outcomes have little meaning without test standardization and the ability to benchmark data with other programs. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the feasibility for measuring standardized outcomes in a large number of rehabilitation programs. The subjects included 928 cardiac patients and 222 pulmonary patients from 35 cardiac and 31 pulmonary rehabilitation programs. The SF-36 Health Survey, patient knowledge test, and 6-minute distance walk were administered before and after completion of the rehabilitation program. The patients completed rehabilitation according to the program guidelines at their respective site. Significant (P P Although this study does not document the effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients, it does demonstrate that the collection and analysis of standardized outcomes among many cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation sites is feasible.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Documenting quality management in rheumatic disease: Are patient questionnaires the best (and only) method?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1996
- Improving Health Care, Part 3: Clinical Benchmarking for Best Patient CareThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1996
- Outcome Measurement in Cardiac and Pulmonary Rehabilitation by the AACVPR Outcomes CommitteeJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 1995
- Outcomes ManagementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988