Accepting research as social intervention: Implications of a systemic epistemology

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This essay is an attempt to illustrate an alternative conceptualization of what is considered “science.” The systemic epistemology introduced by Bateson and others is described as an equally viable complement to traditional epistemological orientations. The distinction between the two orientations is the recognition, within the systemic epistemology, of the interventive role of the observer. A specific model is introduced as providing a working method for conducting research within the systemic epistemology. This model is borrowed from the field of systemic family therapy where intervention in social systems is celebrated and accepted. This model, although clinical in orientation, offers useful guidelines for developing research programs which acknowledge social intervention.