A systematic comparison and evaluation of biclustering methods for gene expression data
Top Cited Papers
- 24 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Bioinformatics
- Vol. 22 (9) , 1122-1129
- https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl060
Abstract
Motivation: In recent years, there have been various efforts to overcome the limitations of standard clustering approaches for the analysis of gene expression data by grouping genes and samples simultaneously. The underlying concept, which is often referred to as biclustering, allows to identify sets of genes sharing compatible expression patterns across subsets of samples, and its usefulness has been demonstrated for different organisms and datasets. Several biclustering methods have been proposed in the literature; however, it is not clear how the different techniques compare with each other with respect to the biological relevance of the clusters as well as with other characteristics such as robustness and sensitivity to noise. Accordingly, no guidelines concerning the choice of the biclustering method are currently available. Results: First, this paper provides a methodology for comparing and validating biclustering methods that includes a simple binary reference model. Although this model captures the essential features of most biclustering approaches, it is still simple enough to exactly determine all optimal groupings; to this end, we propose a fast divide-and-conquer algorithm (Bimax). Second, we evaluate the performance of five salient biclustering algorithms together with the reference model and a hierarchical clustering method on various synthetic and real datasets for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana. The comparison reveals that (1) biclustering in general has advantages over a conventional hierarchical clustering approach, (2) there are considerable performance differences between the tested methods and (3) already the simple reference model delivers relevant patterns within all considered settings. Availability: The datasets used, the outcomes of the biclustering algorithms and the Bimax implementation for the reference model are available at Contact: bleuler@tik.ee.ethz.ch Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available atKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A statistical framework for combining and interpreting proteomic datasetsBioinformatics, 2004
- Scoring clustering solutions by their biological relevanceBioinformatics, 2003
- Characterizing gene sets with FuncAssociateBioinformatics, 2003
- Coupled two-way clustering analysis of breast cancer and colon cancer gene expression dataBioinformatics, 2003
- Iterative signature algorithm for the analysis of large-scale gene expression dataPhysical Review E, 2003
- Comparisons and validation of statistical clustering techniques for microarray gene expression dataBioinformatics, 2003
- A cluster validity framework for genome expression dataBioinformatics, 2002
- On Clustering Validation TechniquesJournal of Intelligent Information Systems, 2001
- Genomic Expression Programs in the Response of Yeast Cells to Environmental ChangesMolecular Biology of the Cell, 2000
- Coupled two-way clustering analysis of gene microarray dataProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000