On a variant of Stroop’s paradigm: Which cognitions press your buttons?
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 29 (6) , 903-904
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196419
Abstract
The Stroop effect typically refers to the fact that the time to identify the color of a visually presented word is affected by the relationship between the word and the color. When the (irrelevant) word is semantically related to the color (e.g., the wordgreen, presented in red) response time is slower than if the word is neutral or unrelated. One question that has been posed concerns whether semantics plays a role only when the task requires an explicit verbal response, or whether it also plays a role when the response is manual. Sharma and McKenna (1998) have reported that semantics plays a role only when the response is vocal. A reanalysis of their data shows that semantics also plays a role when manual responses are made.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential components of the manual and vocal Stroop tasksMemory & Cognition, 1998
- The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.Psychological Bulletin, 1996
- Stroop Interference and Color-Word SimilarityPsychological Science, 1996
- Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995
- Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Word Identification: Imageability, Semantics, and the Content-Functor DistinctionThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 1988
- Pronounceability, Attensity, and Interference in the Color-Word TestPublished by JSTOR ,1967
- Semantic Power Measured through the Interference of Words with Color-NamingThe American Journal of Psychology, 1964
- Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935