Health-Related Quality of Life after Retroperitoneoscopic and Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Nephrectomy

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The assessment of postoperative recovery typically involves the use of measures that are open to bias. Whilst there has been some work done on the short-term postoperative recovery comparison for hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (RPN), to our knowledge, this is the first study to look at long-term health outcomes for these two procedures. This study sought objectively to compare long-term postoperative health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after retroperitoneoscopic and hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy undertaken for renal pathology. This was achieved by both reviewing perioperative data from medical records and by using the SF-36 questionnaire postoperatively. Patients and Methods: Patients who had undergone elective retroperitoneoscopic (N = 19) or transperitoneal HALN (N = 32) between 2001 and 2004 at our institution underwent objective HRQoL assessment via a validated telephone questionnaire (SF-36) and by review of postoperative data from the medical records. This survey was administered between 3 and 6 months after surgery. The data then underwent statistical analysis using the paired Student's t-test. Results: Perioperative data showed no significant difference in the postoperative complication rate in the two groups. The HRQoL scores gathered from the SF-36 questionnaire gave mean scores of 67.4 and 68.5 for the HALN and RPN groups, respectively (100 represents maximum quality of life). This difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: This is the first study to look at long-term (mean follow-up 6 months) health outcomes for patients undergoing RPN and HALN. The results show no greater long-term health benefit for one procedure over the other. This finding supports the data in the literature on the benefits of HALN over RPN in terms of a less protracted learning curve, greater technical ease, fewer intraoperative complications, and consequently reduced operating times with no loss of the long-term health benefit that is traditionally associated with the standard laparoscopic technique.