A multicenter comparative trial of triphasic and monophasic, low-dose combined oral contraceptives
- 30 June 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Contraception
- Vol. 47 (6) , 515-525
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(93)90020-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical experience with triphasic oral contraceptive (Triquilar) in 527 women in ChinaContraception, 1991
- Evaluation of the clinical performance of three triphasic oral contraceptives: A multicenter, randomized comparative trialAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- A comparative analysis of three different dose combinations of oral contraceptivesContraception, 1989
- Metabolic effects of oral contraceptivesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Phasic approach to oral contraceptivesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Clinical Experience with a Triphasic Oral ContraceptiveActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1984
- Comparison of contraceptive acceptability of levonorgestrel and ethinyl oestradiol administered in one three-phasic (Trionetta®) and one monophasic (Neovletta®) versionContraception, 1983
- ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES AND THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE: EFFECTS OF LOWERING ŒSTROGEN CONTENTThe Lancet, 1980
- Fertility Regulation Using “Triphasic” Administration of Ethinyl Estradiol and Levonorgestrel in Comparison with the 30 Plus 150 μg Fixed Dose RegimePublished by Wiley ,1979
- A new procedure for the statistical evaluation of intrauterine contraceptionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1977