Interfacial properties of cell culture media with cell‐protecting additives
- 20 August 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Biotechnology & Bioengineering
- Vol. 47 (4) , 420-430
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260470403
Abstract
In an effort to identify key rheological properties that contribute to cell protection against shear damage, we have measured surface shear and dilatationai viscosities, dynamic surface tension, foaminess, and foam stability for media containing cell‐protecting additives. In a companion article,18 we found that cell‐to‐bubble attachment was decreased in media containing Methocel, Pluronic F68, or polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). In medium containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) or potyvinyl‐pyrrolidone (PVP), attachment was increased. PEG, PVP, serum (FBS), and serum albumin (BSA) increased the surface viscosity of the air/medium surface (thus, producing a more rigid interface), whereas F68 and PVA lowered it greatly. Foaming experiments showed that Methocel, PEG, PVA, and F68 decreased the foam half‐life while FBS, BSA, and PVP were foam stabilizers. Interestingly, the foam stability of CHO cell suspensions decreased significantly for cell concentrations higher than ca. 2 × 106 cells/mL. Nonviable CHO cells reduced foam stability further. Dynamic surface tension values of the media tested were found significantly differentfrom their static surface tension values. The interfacial properties measured and the results presented in the companion study suggest that the additives that lower dynamic surface tension the most (Methocel, F68, and PVA) correlate well with reduced cell‐to‐bubble attachment, and thus, cell protection. Reduced dynamic surface tension with these additives implies faster surfactant adsorption, mobile interfaces, lower surface viscosity, and foam destabilization. Because PEG and PVP resulted in increased cell‐to‐bubble attachment and had different interfacial properties, a different mechanism (compared with Methocel, PVP, and F68) is apparently responsible for their protective effect. Finally, cell protection offered by FBS and BSA is attributed to the foam stabilization properties provided by these additives. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons Inc.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Competitive adsorption of food macromolecules and surfactants at the oil-water interfacePublished by Springer Nature ,2008
- The protective effect of specific medium additives with respect to bubble ruptureBiotechnology & Bioengineering, 1995
- Bubble bed reactor: A reactor design to minimize the damage of bubble aeration on animal cellsBiotechnology & Bioengineering, 1994
- Gas bubbles bursting at a free surfaceJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 1993
- Foams, thin films and surface rheological propertiesProgress in Surface Science, 1992
- Polyvinyl alcohol and polyethylene glycol as protectants against fluid-mechanical injury of freely-suspended animal cells (CRL 8018)Journal of Biotechnology, 1991
- Protection mechanisms of freely suspended animal cells (CRL 8018) from fluid‐mechanical injury. Viscometric and bioreactor studies using serum, pluronic F68 and polyethylene glycolBiotechnology & Bioengineering, 1991
- Fluid-mechanical damage of animal cells in bioreactorsTrends in Biotechnology, 1991
- Media additives for protecting freely suspended animal cells against agitation and aeration damageTrends in Biotechnology, 1991
- The effect of interfacial viscosities on the motion of drops and bubblesThe Chemical Engineering Journal, 1979