Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelines
Open Access
- 8 December 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 102 (1) , 173-180
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605462
Abstract
Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic markers in cancer: the evolution of evidence from single studies to meta-analysis, and beyondBritish Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Ki-67 as prognostic marker in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published studies involving 12 155 patientsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Survival Prediction in Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme by Human Telomerase Genetic VariationJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2006
- Expression of Carbonic Anhydrase IX in Astrocytic Tumors Predicts Poor PrognosisClinical Cancer Research, 2006
- REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)British Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Prognostic Significance of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Immunohistochemical Expression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-AnalysisClinical Cancer Research, 2005
- Prognostic FactorsPublished by S. Karger AG ,2004
- Reporting of prognostic markers: current problems and development of guidelines for evidence-based practice in the futureBritish Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Potential for Selection Bias with Tumor Tissue Retrieval in Molecular Epidemiology StudiesAnnals of Epidemiology, 2002
- Methodological issues associated with tumor marker developmentUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2000