On the High Predictive Potential of Change and Growth Measures
- 1 December 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 42 (4) , 961-968
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448204200403
Abstract
Formulas in the statistical theory of test scores have led some psychometricians to believe that measures of change and growth have questionable value in research. However, certain combinations of parameters, when substituted into these formulas, yield reliable change scores and high non-spurious correlations between change scores and independent criterion scores, even when pretest scores are not good predictors of either changes or the criterion. Because of mathematical constraints, these particular combinations of parameters are the ones to be expected in research designs if valid and reliable changes in individuals' test scores do occur. Accordingly, it is possible for measures of change and growth to have excellent predictive value, as investigators in many fields have taken for granted, and, conversely, independent variables can be excellent predictors of changes. Although criteria which are highly correlated with changes are difficult to discover empirically, their existence cannot be ruled out by statistical arguments alone.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- GAIN SCORES IN RESEARCH CAN BE HIGHLY RELIABLEJournal of Educational Measurement, 1982
- The Determination of the Significance of Change Between Pre- and Posttesting PeriodsReview of Educational Research, 1977
- A Simulation Study of the Use of Change Measures to Compare Educational ProgramsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1975
- Extending Classical Test Theory to the Measurement of ChangeReview of Educational Research, 1972
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970
- Theory of mental tests.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1950
- The ability to learn.Psychological Review, 1946
- A formula to correct for the effect of errors of measurement on the correlation of initial values with gains.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1924