Comparative study of subculture, Gram staining and acridine orange staining for early detection of positive blood cultures.
Open Access
- 30 April 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 36 (5) , 595-597
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.36.5.595
Abstract
In view of the importance of a rapid aetiological diagnosis in septicaemia, we compared the results of subculture, Gram staining and acridine orange staining in the detection of positive blood cultures. The study was based on 1013 blood cultures of which 138 were positive by culture. The three techniques were applied 12 h after the specimen was taken in 210 instances, at 24 h in 540 instances and after 48 h in 525. We were able to demonstrate the value of direct examination. Staining with acridine orange yields more positive results than Gram staining and is also simpler.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of a Centrifugation Method of Blood Culturing in a Community Acute-Care HospitalLaboratory Medicine, 1979
- Rapid Detection of Bacteremia by a Radiometric System: A Clinical EvaluationAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1974
- Comparison of two liquid blood culture media containing sodium polyanethole sulfonate: tryptic soy and Columbia.1974
- Comparison of macroscopic examination, routine gram stains, and routine subcultures in the initial detection of positive blood cultures.1974
- Comparison of Macroscopic Examination, Routine Gram Stains, and Routine Subcultures in the Initial Detection of Positive Blood CulturesApplied Microbiology, 1974
- Comparison of Two Liquid Blood Culture Media Containing Sodium Polyanetholesulfonate: Tryptic Soy and ColumbiaApplied Microbiology, 1974
- Evaluation of radiometric system for detecting bacteremia.1973
- Evaluation of Radiometric System for Detecting BacteremiaApplied Microbiology, 1973
- Automated radiometric detection of bacterial growth in blood cultures.1970