Is first-line single-agent mitoxantrone in the treatment ofhigh-risk metastatic breast cancer patients as effective as combination chemotherapy? No difference in survival but higher quality of life were found in a multicenter randomized trial
Open Access
- 1 November 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 13 (11) , 1717-1729
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdf306
Abstract
Background: To determine whether patients with high-risk metastatic breast cancer draw benefit from combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Patients and methods: A total of 260 women with measurable metastatic breast cancer fulfilling high-risk criteria, previously untreated with chemotherapy for their metastatic disease, were randomized to receive either mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 or the combination of fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 (FEC) every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until complete remission plus two cycles, or until disease progression. In the case of partial remission or stable disease, treatment was stopped after 12 cycles. Second-line treatment was vindesine, mitomycin and prednisolone. Gain from treatment was estimated using a modified Brunner’s score composed of time to progression, patients’ rating of the treatment benefit, alopecia, vomiting and performance status. Results: After recruitment from 1992 to 1997 and observation from 1997 to 1999, the final evaluation showed that single-agent treatment with mitoxantrone does not differ significantly from combination treatment with FEC in terms of response, objective remission rate, remission duration, time to response, time to best response, time to progression or overall survival. There was, however, a significant difference in gain from treatment using a modified Brunner’s score favoring the single-agent treatment arm. There was no evidence that any subgroup would fare better with combination treatment. Conclusions: No significant difference was detected between the treatment with mitoxantrone as a single agent and the combination of low-dose FEC in terms of response or survival; therefore, the imperative of the necessity of first-line combination chemotherapy for patients with high-risk metastatic breast cancer may be questioned. Since toxicity and quality of life score favored the single-agent mitoxantrone treatment arm, this treatment may be offered to patients preferring quality of life to a potential small prolongation of survival.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accelerated-Intensified Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin, and Fluorouracil (CEF) Compared With Standard CEF in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Study of the Italian Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ouest–Mammella Inter Gruppo GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Benefit of a High-Dose Epirubicin Regimen in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients With Poor Prognostic Factors: 5-Year Follow-Up Results of French Adjuvant Study Group 05 Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Anthracycline Adjuvant Chemotherapy: How Much Is Enough?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Intensification of Adjuvant Chemotherapy: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide With High-Dose Mitoxantrone and Cyclophosphamide With Filgrastim in Operable Breast Cancer With 10 or More Involved Axillary NodesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2001
- Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- A randomized study of epirubicin monotherapy every four or every two weeks in advanced breast cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group studyAnnals of Oncology, 1997
- Doubling epirubicin dose intensity (100 mg/m2 versus 50 mg/m2) in the FEC regimen significantly increases response rates. An international randomised phase III study in metastatic breast cancerAnnals of Oncology, 1997
- Dose-response relationship of epirubicin in the treatment of postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized study of epirubicin at four different dose levels performed by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) allows acceleration and dose intensity increase of CEF chemotherapy: a randomised study in patients with advanced breast cancerBritish Journal of Cancer, 1994
- A prospective randomized trial comparing epirubicin monochemotherapy to two fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide, and epirubicin regimens differing in epirubicin dose in advanced breast cancer patients. The French Epirubicin Study Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1991