The Process and Significance of Political Scandals: A Comparison of Watergate and the "Sewergate" Episode at the Environmental Protection Agency
- 1 February 1986
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Social Problems
- Vol. 33 (3) , 202-217
- https://doi.org/10.2307/800705
Abstract
Purposeful scandalmongering is a familiar and particularly dramatic feature of the American political process. If successful, it embarrasses one's political opponents, blocks their policies, and perhaps even drives them from office. This paper compares Watergate, the most important recent example of political scandal, and “Sewergate,” the 1983 episode at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Based on this comparison, I develop a conceptual framework that describes the course or trajectory of scandal. I then evaluate what effects the two episodes had on substantive policy and on mass political attitudes. I find that neither Watergate nor Sewergate had much enduring impact and conclude by discussing the significance of scandals in light of their rather modest long-term consequences.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Political Corruption in the United StatesPolitical Studies, 1981
- The Paradox of Public Discourse: A Framework for the Analysis of Political AccountsThe Journal of Politics, 1980
- Realpolitik and Play PoliticsSimulation & Games, 1977
- Watergate in Retrospect: The Forgotten AgendaPublic Administration Review, 1976
- The Road to Watergate and beyond: The Growth and Abuse of Executive Authority since 1940Law and Contemporary Problems, 1976
- Watergate and Political SocializationAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1975
- Children's Images of the President and of Government in 1962 and 1974American Politics Quarterly, 1975
- Young Voters' Reactions To Early Watergate IssuesAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1975
- The Moral Psychology of WatergateJournal of Social Issues, 1975
- Theses on the Theory of the StateNew German Critique, 1975