Determining the impact of sex preferences on fertility: A consideration of parity progression ratio, dominance, and stopping rule measures
Open Access
- 1 August 1979
- journal article
- Published by Duke University Press in Demography
- Vol. 16 (3) , 377-388
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2061219
Abstract
The two methods commonly used to assess the effect of sex preferences on fertility are inadequate to the task. Parity progression ratio analyses suffer from logical problems stemming from the heterogeneity of sex preferences and the riskiness of fertility decisions. While conjoint measurement-dominance procedures overcome these logical problems, they cannot yield quantitative estimates of the impact of sex preferences on fertility. A stopping rule measure which overcomes these limitations is proposed and described and its potential for determining the effect of sex predetermination methods on population is discussed.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subjective probabilities for sex of next child: U.S. College students and Philippine villagersPopulation and Environment, 1978
- Parental predetermination of the sex of offspring: the attitudes of young married couples with university educationJournal of Biosocial Science, 1976
- Do Sex Preferences Really Matter?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1976
- Preference scales for number and sex of ChildrenPopulation Studies, 1975
- Gender preferences, sex predetermination, and family size in the United StatesSocial Biology, 1974
- Preference for Sons, Desire for Additional Children, and Family Planning in ThailandJournal of Marriage and Family, 1974
- Sex Preselection in the United States: Some ImplicationsScience, 1974
- Sex predetermination: Its impact on fertilitySocial Biology, 1971
- Some effects of being able to control sex of offspringEugenics Quarterly, 1967
- Some possible effects of birth control on the human sex ratioAnnals of Human Genetics, 1961