Cyclophosphamide, Methotrexate, and Fluorouracil Versus Tamoxifen Plus Ovarian Suppression as Adjuvant Treatment of Estrogen Receptor–Positive Pre-/Perimenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the Italian Breast Cancer Adjuvant Study Group 02 Randomized Trial
- 14 July 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 18 (14) , 2718-2727
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.14.2718
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of chemotherapy versus that of tamoxifen plus ovarian suppression in pre-/perimenopausal estrogen receptor–positive patients with early breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either six cycles of a standard regimen of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8 (CMF), with all drugs restarted on day 29, or 5 years of tamoxifen, 30 mg/d, plus ovarian suppression with surgical oophorectomy, ovarian irradiation, or monthly goserelin 3.6-mg injections. Disease-free survival was the main study end point. Overall survival and toxicity were additional end points. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1997, 120 patients were assigned to CMF and 124 to tamoxifen and ovarian suppression (oophorectomy, n = 6; ovarian irradiation, n = 31; and goserelin injections, n = 87). At the time of analysis (median follow-up time, 76 months; range, 9 to 121 months), 82 patients had relapsed and 39 had died. No difference between groups had emerged with respect to either disease-free or overall survival. Treatments were comparable even in respect to age, tumor size, and nodal status, although a nonsignificant trend favored patients with poorly differentiated tumors treated with CMF. Leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and alopecia were significantly more common in patients treated with CMF. There were few patients who developed benign gynecologic changes in either group, and numbers were comparable. CONCLUSION: The combination of tamoxifen with ovarian suppression seems to be safe and to yield comparable results relative to standard CMF.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen and goserelin vs. CMF in premenopausal stage I and II hormone-responsive breast cancer patients: four-year results of Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group (ABCSG) trial 5European Journal Of Cancer, 1999
- Adjuvant ovarian ablation versus CMF chemotherapy in premenopausal women with pathological stage II breast carcinoma: the Scottish trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Consensus review of the clinical utility of dna cytometry in carcinoma of the breastCytometry, 1993
- Chemotherapy versus tamoxifen versus chemotherapy plus tamoxifen in node-positive, oestrogen-receptor positive breast cancer patients. An update at 7 years of the 1st GROCTA (breast cancer adjuvant chemo-hormone therapy cooperative group) trialEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1992
- Alteration of Endocrine Parameters in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer During Long-Term Adjuvant Therapy With Tamoxifen as the Single AgentJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991
- Cell kinetics as a prognostic indicator in node-negative breast cancerEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1989
- Effects of Adjuvant Tamoxifen and of Cytotoxic Therapy on Mortality in Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Ten-year experience with CMF-based adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable breast cancerBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 1985
- Evaluation of Response-Time Data Involving Transient States: An Illustration Using Heart-Transplant DataJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958