A fertility-sparing alternative to radical hysterectomy: how many patients may be eligible?
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Gynecologic Oncology
- Vol. 95 (3) , 534-538
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.060
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2004CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2004
- Pregnancy outcomes in patients after radical trachelectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Radical vaginal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical carcinomaGynecologic Oncology, 2003
- Radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of cervical cancerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Radical trachelectomy in early stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and fertility ratesBritish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2001
- Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomyCancer, 2000
- Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with Stage IA-B carcinoma of the cervix?Cancer, 1999
- Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancerAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1998
- Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- STAGE IB SQUAMOUS CANCER OF THE CERVIXObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1978