Hysteroscopy: An Analysis of 523 Patients
- 1 August 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 29 (3) , 253-255
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1989.tb01731.x
Abstract
An analysis is presented of the indications for, and findings on, hysteroscopy in 523 patients undergoing gynaecological investigation or treatment. Abnormal uterine bleeding or discharge was the indication for investigation in 202 patients. Based on hysteroscopic observation, dilatation and curettage (D and C) was adjudged unnecessary in 114 (56%) and a subsequent D and C on these patients revealed no histological abnormalities. In the remainder, more abnormalities were observed visually on hysteroscopy than were detected by D and C. The results suggest that D and C should be replaced by hysteroscopy and biopsy as a first-line investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding or discharge.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hysteroscopy as a Diagnostic AidObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 1988
- A comparative study between panoramic hysteroscopy with directed biopsies and dilatation and curettageAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Office hysteroscopy and suction curettage: Can we eliminate the hospital diagnostic dilatation and curettage?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- The Value of Endometrial Cytology. A Comparative Study of the Gravlee Jet-Washer, Isaacs Cell Sampler, and Endoscann Versus Curettage in 600 PatientsObstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 1985
- Diagnostic dilation and curettage: A reappraisalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Hysteroscopy: A clinical experience with 320 patientsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1977