Measuring Surgical Quality: What’s the Role of Provider Volume?
- 8 September 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in World Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 29 (10) , 1217-1221
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7989-4
Abstract
Although not ideal for all situations, provider volume is particularly suited for measuring surgical quality in certain contexts. Specifically, we believe that for uncommon operations with a strong volumes–outcome effect, provider volume may be the most informative performance measure. Because of the relative ease of determining provider volume, it will continue to be used in value-based purchasing and public reporting efforts. With increasing momentum from outside the profession of surgery, it is particularly important for surgeons to participate in making decisions regarding situations where volume may be an appropriate measure of quality.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measuresSurgery, 2004
- Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2004
- How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care?International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2004
- Do Well-Publicized Risk-Adjusted Outcomes Reports Affect Hospital Volume?Medical Care, 2004
- Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volume and Patient Mortality, 1998–2000Annals of Surgery, 2004
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Effect of the Volume of Procedures at Transplantation Centers on Mortality after Liver TransplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Do “America's Best Hospitals” Perform Better for Acute Myocardial Infarction?New England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryMedical Care, 1991