Randomized evaluation of the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes receiving the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor eptifibatide.
- 21 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 107 (2) , 238-244
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000050144.67910.13
Abstract
Background— Current pharmacotherapeutic options for high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients include aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin, and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. A key issue of uncertainty is the safety and efficacy of combination glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor and low-molecular-weight heparin therapy. Methods and Results— We randomized 746 patients with rest ischemic discomfort within 24 hours after the onset of symptoms and ST-segment deviation and/or elevation of serum cardiac markers to receive open-label enoxaparin (1 mg/kg subcutaneously twice daily) or unfractionated heparin (70-U/kg bolus; 15 U · kg −1 · h −1 infusion, titrated to an activated partial thromboplastin time of 1.5 to 2 times control) for 48 hours. All patients received aspirin and eptifibatide (180-μg/kg bolus; 2 μg · kg −1 · min −1 infusion). Major non-coronary artery bypass surgery-related bleeding at 96 hours (primary safety outcome) was significantly lower among enoxaparin-treated patients than among heparin-treated patients (1.8% versus 4.6%, P =0.03). Minor bleeding was more frequent in the enoxaparin group (30.3% versus 20.8%, P =0.003). Patients in the enoxaparin group were less likely to experience ischemia as detected by continuous ECG evaluation (primary efficacy outcome) during the initial (14.3% versus 25.4%, P =0.0002) and subsequent (12.7% versus 25.9%, P P =0.031). Conclusions— When aspirin and eptifibatide are used in high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients, enoxaparin improves outcomes (determined on the basis of better safety and efficacy) compared with currently recommended unfractionated heparin therapy and provides a useful novel alternative therapeutic strategy.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized double-blind safety study of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes treated with tirofiban and aspirin: The ACUTE II studyAmerican Heart Journal, 2002
- Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2002
- Low molecular weight heparin decreases rebound ischemia in unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: the Canadian ESSENCE ST segment monitoring substudyJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non–st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the american college of cardiology/ american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina)Published by Elsevier ,2000
- Inhibition of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa with Eptifibatide in Patients with Acute Coronary SyndromesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A Comparison of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin with Unfractionated Heparin for Unstable Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Reactivation of Unstable Angina after the Discontinuation of HeparinNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- ST segment shift in unstable angina: pathophysiology and association with coronary anatomy and hospital outcomeJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Silent ischemia predicts infarction and death during 2 year follow-up of unstable anginaJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Silent Ischemia as a Marker for Early Unfavorable Outcomes in Patients with Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986