Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
Top Cited Papers
- 14 April 2014
- journal article
- Published by Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 111 (16) , 5773-5777
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404402111
Abstract
The long-held but erroneous assumption of never-ending rapid growth in biomedical science has created an unsustainable hypercompetitive system that is discouraging even the most outstanding prospective students from entering our profession--and making it difficult for seasoned investigators to produce their best work. This is a recipe for long-term decline, and the problems cannot be solved with simplistic approaches. Instead, it is time to confront the dangers at hand and rethink some fundamental features of the US biomedical research ecosystem.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibilityNature, 2014
- The Basics of TranslationScience, 2013
- How Economics Shapes SciencePublished by Harvard University Press ,2012
- A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical researchNature, 2012
- Perverse incentivesNature, 2012
- Improving Graduate Education to Support a Branching Career Pipeline: Recommendations Based on a Survey of Doctoral Students in the Basic Biomedical SciencesCBE—Life Sciences Education, 2011
- Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2011
- Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life SciencesPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2009
- Structural Disequilibria in Biomedical ResearchScience, 2008
- Science: The Endless FrontierTransactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 1945