Pitfalls in the Use of Time as an Explanatory Variable in Regression
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Vol. 2 (1) , 73-82
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1984.10509371
Abstract
Regression of a trendless random walk on time produces R-squared values around .44 regardless of sample length. The residuals from the regression exhibit only about 14% as much variation as the original series even though the underlying process has no functional dependence on time. The autocorrelation structure of these “detrended” random walks is pseudo-cyclical and purely artifactual. Conventional tests for trend are strongly biased toward finding a trend when none is present, and this effect is only partially mitigated by Cochrane-Orcutt correction for autocorrelation. The results are extended to show that pairs of detrended random walks exhibit spurious correlation.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time seriesJournal of Monetary Economics, 1982
- Spurious Periodicity in Inappropriately Detrended Time SeriesEconometrica, 1981
- A production function--nonaccelerating inflation approach to potential outputCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1979
- Money, income, and sunspots: Measuring economic relationships and the effects of differencingJournal of Monetary Economics, 1978
- Estimation of a non-invertible moving average processJournal of Econometrics, 1977
- A Note on Trend Removal Methods: The Case of Polynomial Regression versus Variate DifferencingEconometrica, 1977
- Spurious regressions in econometricsJournal of Econometrics, 1974
- Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression When Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent VariablesEconometrica, 1970
- Seasonal Adjustment of Economic Time Series and Multiple Regression AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1963