Extent of Cross‐Fertilization in Maize by Pollen from Neighboring Transgenic Hybrids
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- maize management
- Published by Wiley in Crop Science
- Vol. 44 (4) , 1273-1282
- https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1273
Abstract
There is an increasing concern about the preservation of genetic identity of conventional maize (Zea mays L.) and of distance required to segregate non‐genetically modified (non‐GM) from GM grain production since the introduction of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and other transgenic events into commercial hybrids. Field experiments were conducted at three sites in Ottawa, Canada, for 3 yr to determine (i) the extent of cross‐fertilization of a maize genotype by foreign pollen of neighboring hybrids and (ii) the practical distance required to isolate conventional maize hybrids from neighboring GM maize fields. At each site, yellow‐kernel Bt maize was planted in the center (27 by 27 m) of a field surrounded in all directions by the distance equivalent to 24 or 48 rows (37 m) of white‐kernel maize, and a 200‐m non‐maize crop was maintained in all directions. Phenology and weather conditions were closely monitored during the tasseling and silking period. At maturity, a thorough examination on the cross‐fertilization was conducted in the white maize population. Our results showed that the rate of cross‐fertilization in maize was dependent upon the distance from the pollen source, wind direction and synchronization of silking and pollen shedding of the two genotypes involved. Up to 82% out‐cross was measured in the first row adjacent to the Bt maize. The level of out‐cross was P < 0.01) to the cross‐fertilization data as a function of distance from the yellow maize pollen source with R2 up to 0.64. Our data suggested that it is possible to produce non‐GM maize grains by removing the outside rows of non‐GM maize plants (about 30 m) neighboring the GM maize field in concern if the acceptance level is set at ≤1% out‐cross. The generally recommended 200‐m distance between two genotypes (inbreds, populations, hybrids, and wild relatives) appears to be appropriate for Bt or other GM maize, as well.Keywords
Funding Information
- Pioneer Hi-Bred
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative Relationships between Pollen Shed Density and Grain Yield in MaizeCrop Science, 2003
- Ear Temperature and Pollination Timing Effects on Maize Kernel SetCrop Science, 2001
- Bt and Non‐Bt Maize Growth and Development as Affected by Temperature and Drought StressAgronomy Journal, 2000
- Pollen Control During Transgenic Hybrid Maize Development in MexicoCrop Science, 1998
- Field Performance of Elite Transgenic Maize Plants Expressing an Insecticidal Protein Derived from Bacillus thuringiensisNature Biotechnology, 1993
- Short‐ and Long‐Term Responses of Corn to a Pre‐Anthesis Soil Water DeficitAgronomy Journal, 1992
- Pollen Viability, Pollen Shedding, and Combining Ability for Tassel Heat Tolerance in Maize1Crop Science, 1987
- Drought Stress and Its Effects on Maize Reproductive Systems1Crop Science, 1981
- Dispersion and Deposition of Corn Pollen from Experimental Sources1Agronomy Journal, 1972
- Contamination of seed cropsHeredity, 1947