The impact of routine obstetric ultrasonographic screening in a low-risk population
- 30 November 1996
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 175 (5) , 1142-1145
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70019-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- The accuracy of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting congenital anomaliesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994
- A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: Impact on the detection, management, and outcome of anomalous fetusesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994
- Effect of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening on Perinatal OutcomeNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Routine obstetric ultrasoundUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1993
- Routine radiographer screening for fetal abnormalities by ultrasound in an unselected low risk populationThe British Journal of Radiology, 1992
- Value of routine ultrasound scanning at 19 weeks: a four year study of 8849 deliveries.BMJ, 1992
- Effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in detecting fetal structural abnormalities in a low risk population.BMJ, 1991
- Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: The Belgian Multicentric StudyUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1991
- Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancyThe Lancet, 1990
- Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: An indication for obstetric ultrasonographyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989