An Experimental and Theoretical Appraisal of the Perspective and Size-Constancy Theories of Illusions
Open Access
- 1 November 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 22 (4) , 631-652
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747008401942
Abstract
The perspective and size-constancy theories of illusions are described. They both imply that illusory distortions arise as a consequence of mistaken perceptual impressions of depth. Predictions from these theories are tested in six experiments and several ancillary studies. They show that although differences in apparent distance may be sufficient for the appearance of illusions their presence is not a necessary condition. Detailed theoretical implications of these results are considered in discussion.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL APPRAISAL OF THE INAPPROPRIATE SIZE‐DEPTH THEORIES OF ILLUSIONSBritish Journal of Psychology, 1968
- Illusions and Size-ConstancyThe American Journal of Psychology, 1968
- THE SIZE‐CONSTANCY THEORY OF VISUAL ILLUSIONSBritish Journal of Psychology, 1966
- Susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer Illusion and its Relationship to Differences in Size ConstancyQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966
- THE PERCEPTION OF ILLUSIONS AS A CONSTANCY PHENOMENONBritish Journal of Psychology, 1965
- Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy ScalingNature, 1963
- The destruction of the Müller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: I. An examination of two theories.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1950
- Shape as a Function of the Vector-FieldThe American Journal of Psychology, 1939
- Practice and Unprovability in the Müller-Lyer Illusion in Relation to IntelligenceThe Journal of General Psychology, 1929
- Practice and its effects on the perception of illusions.Psychological Review, 1902