Covariate-based constrained randomization of group-randomized trials
- 1 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Clinical Trials
- Vol. 1 (3) , 297-305
- https://doi.org/10.1191/1740774504cn024oa
Abstract
Group-randomized study designs are useful when individually randomized designs are either not possible, or will not be able to estimate the parameters of interest. Blocked and/or stratified (for example, pair-matched) designs have been used, and their properties statistically evaluated by many researchers. Group-randomized trials often have small numbers of experimental units, and strong, geographically induced between-unit correlation, which increase the chance of obtaining a “bad” randomization outcome. This article describes a procedure – random selection from a list of acceptable allocations – to allocate treatment conditions in a way that ensures balance on relevant covariates. Numerous individual- and group-level covariates can be balanced using exact or caliper criteria. Simulation results indicate that this method has good frequency properties, but some care may be needed not to overly constrain the randomization. There is a trade-off between achieving good balance through a highly constrained design, and jeopardizing the appearance of impartiality of the investigator and potentially departing from the nominal Type I error.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- ON DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND RANDOMIZATION-BASED INFERENCE FOR COMMUNITY INTERVENTION TRIALSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Statistical considerations in the design and analysis of community intervention trialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Breaking the matches in a paired t‐test for community interventions when the number of pairs is smallStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Adaptive assignment versus balanced randomization in clinical trials: A decision analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1995
- Dynamic balanced randomization for clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- The effect of matching on the power of randomized community intervention studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Sample size requirements for stratified cluster randomization designsStatistics in Medicine, 1992
- Assessing the gain in efficiency due to matching in a community intervention studyStatistics in Medicine, 1990
- Group ComparabilityEvaluation Review, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983